<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Gearing up for handset production</title> <atom:link href="http://www.nearfieldcommunicationsworld.com/2009/08/19/31561/gearing-up-for-handset-production/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.nearfieldcommunicationsworld.com/2009/08/19/31561/gearing-up-for-handset-production/</link> <description>The near field communication news source - NFC, RF SIM, contactless, RFID, mobile, payments and more</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 13:27:20 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator> <item><title>By: Shubha</title><link>http://www.nearfieldcommunicationsworld.com/2009/08/19/31561/gearing-up-for-handset-production/#comment-1762</link> <dc:creator>Shubha</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:50:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nearfieldcommunicationsworld.com/?p=1561#comment-1762</guid> <description>I am afraid but I am still unable to understand the specific difference between SIM , Secure Element (SE) and UICC. Who are the UICC vendors or manufactures? What is the role of the SE and UICC in NFC handsets?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am afraid but I am still unable to understand the specific difference between SIM , Secure Element (SE) and UICC. Who are the UICC vendors or manufactures? What is the role of the SE and UICC in NFC handsets?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris</title><link>http://www.nearfieldcommunicationsworld.com/2009/08/19/31561/gearing-up-for-handset-production/#comment-1630</link> <dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 06:49:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nearfieldcommunicationsworld.com/?p=1561#comment-1630</guid> <description>Which card-makers? SIM vendors will have new business because people will need new UICCs in the phones. Tag vendors will have an increased market as tags are used to identify SmartPoster, medicine, daily items, money, etc. Maybe regular SmartCard vendors (plastic cards) will face decreased volumes, but they can push now their service to phones and charge for the operation.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which card-makers? SIM vendors will have new business because people will need new UICCs in the phones. Tag vendors will have an increased market as tags are used to identify SmartPoster, medicine, daily items, money, etc. Maybe regular SmartCard vendors (plastic cards) will face decreased volumes, but they can push now their service to phones and charge for the operation.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: TY</title><link>http://www.nearfieldcommunicationsworld.com/2009/08/19/31561/gearing-up-for-handset-production/#comment-1624</link> <dc:creator>TY</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:14:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nearfieldcommunicationsworld.com/?p=1561#comment-1624</guid> <description>Please add the card makers as one of the players in the politics ...  There is no incentive for the card makers to promote NFC as it will essentially reduce the volume of cards.  To deploy NFC, it is certainly important to take it as a strategic tool to win market.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please add the card makers as one of the players in the politics ...  There is no incentive for the card makers to promote NFC as it will essentially reduce the volume of cards.  To deploy NFC, it is certainly important to take it as a strategic tool to win market.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sarah Clark</title><link>http://www.nearfieldcommunicationsworld.com/2009/08/19/31561/gearing-up-for-handset-production/#comment-1621</link> <dc:creator>Sarah Clark</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:09:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nearfieldcommunicationsworld.com/?p=1561#comment-1621</guid> <description>Ouch! Did you read our article on Stollmann and STMicro before you wrote your comment? (I&#039;ve now added a direct link to it above).Yes, of course there are business issues with NFC too. And we write about them all the time here at NFCW.What this article is pointing out is that, in terms of semiconductor development timescales, technology and standards have *not* been there &#039;for some time&#039;. In fact, in terms of enabling handset manufacturers to make commercially viable mass volume NFC devices, we are only just getting started.And, as we&#039;ve found during our research for The NFC Report (www.thenfcreport.com), there are several parts of the world where the business issues have already been fully worked out. All that is now holding them back from a commercial launch is a lack of handsets...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ouch! Did you read our article on Stollmann and STMicro before you wrote your comment? (I've now added a direct link to it above).</p><p>Yes, of course there are business issues with NFC too. And we write about them all the time here at NFCW.</p><p>What this article is pointing out is that, in terms of semiconductor development timescales, technology and standards have *not* been there 'for some time'. In fact, in terms of enabling handset manufacturers to make commercially viable mass volume NFC devices, we are only just getting started.</p><p>And, as we've found during our research for The NFC Report (www.thenfcreport.com), there are several parts of the world where the business issues have already been fully worked out. All that is now holding them back from a commercial launch is a lack of handsets...</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ben Hur</title><link>http://www.nearfieldcommunicationsworld.com/2009/08/19/31561/gearing-up-for-handset-production/#comment-1619</link> <dc:creator>Ben Hur</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 04:34:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nearfieldcommunicationsworld.com/?p=1561#comment-1619</guid> <description>If you think technology is the only thing holding back NFC, you&#039;re sorely mistaken.  A good part of the problem is the wrestling match between the handset makers, bankers and carriers over how they&#039;re going to divide up the economic pie, including who will own the secure element. The technology and standards are there, and have been for some time.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you think technology is the only thing holding back NFC, you're sorely mistaken.  A good part of the problem is the wrestling match between the handset makers, bankers and carriers over how they're going to divide up the economic pie, including who will own the secure element. The technology and standards are there, and have been for some time.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using xcache
Page Caching using xcache (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 4/11 queries in 0.018 seconds using xcache
Content Delivery Network via nfcworld.wpcdn.com

Served from: www.nearfieldcommunicationsworld.com @ 2010-09-10 03:15:39 -->